![]() Photo by Betty Campbell |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Update - August 2004The Conservation Committee received a copy of the new Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by Golder Associates for R.W. Tomlinson, owner of the proposed quarry site at 5309 Bank Street. Several mitigation measures were outlined, including the possibility of transplanting the rare plant species to another site. One of our committee members pointed out that transplanting or relocating species is not easy and does not guarantee that the plants will continue to grow elsewhere. The committee sent a letter to the City of Ottawa listing flaws in the proposed mitigation measures, particularly those dealing with transplanting species, as above. The committee also sent a letter to the Aggregate Resources Inspector at OMNR Kemptville opposing the application for rezoning of this site as a quarry (see letter) A peer review of the above Golder Report was undertaken by Brunton Consulting Services. The Conservation Committee has a copy of this report. Update - June 2004The Conservation Committee drafted a letter to OMNR opposing the granting of a licence under the Aggregate Resources Act to R.W. Tomlinson which would allow quarrying at the 5309 Bank Street site. In this we supported the submission made by the Greenspace Alliance (GA) on the same issue. We believe that the proponent's Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ignores important documentation pertaining to the existence of significant plant species; the 1997 Natural Environmental Systems Strategy (NESS) which documented the natural value of the site and recommended leaving it in a natural state; and relevant City of Ottawa records.
Update - April 2004Last year we asked the city not to sell this site at 5309 Bank because of its ecological importance which has been well documented over the years by OFNC members. Unfortunately, the site was sold, albeit with the promise that a full and proper environmental assessment would be performed before any changes were made to the area. In early March, notice was received from city planning of an application to change the zoning from Agricultural to Resource extraction (limestone quarrying). The city planner, when contacted, provided a copy of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Level 2 mitigation plan for the site. The EIS is inadequate, missing most of the species documented by professional botanists. For example, it does not include grasses or sedges , and has mis-classified many of the plants it did identify. A full and proper assessment needs to be done. And since a number of species on the COSEWEC list have been identified there this would be a test of the new Species at Risk Act (SARA). The time period for comments has been delayed until May 7, because of concerns of the neighbours over wells and blasting, but the OFNC and others need to act on this issue now. Background
In 1978, the Blais Road Conservation Area in South Gloucester situated between Rideau Road and Regional Road 8, and between Highway 31 and Baseline Road, encompassed roughly 950 acres (390 hectares) (Dugal 1978). Since then, it has been fragmented and reduced in size primarily due to quarry operations. The remaining portion of approximately 200 acres (80 hectares) contains many significant natural features, outstanding habitat diversity and an unusually high number of plant species, including many considered rare or sparse either within the City of Ottawa or the province. In 1978 the Ottawa Field-Naturalists' club (OFNC) learned that a proposal had been put forth by the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton (RMOC) to "de-designate" the Blais Road Conservation Area. The OFNC's Conservation Committee examined the reasons for this change, then made 16 detailed site visits in order to assess for themselves the "current state of the area" (Dugal et al, 1978). These visits resulted in a well-documented report (Dugal et al, 1978), which cogently delineated numerous reasons for preserving the site in its entirety. Proposed boundaries for the site were given along with a suggestion to re-name it the "South Gloucester Conservation Area." In their proposal, Dugal et al (1978), noted that the area was ecologically diverse, having both botanical and geological significance, contained scenic features and was used for recreational purposes. Extensive field work undertaken by Albert Dugal in 1978 resulted in an impressive list of plant species found within the area. Further work has since added to the botanical inventory. (See Flora of South Gloucester.)
Natural Values and Significant FeaturesWithin the relatively small, compact remnant of the original Blais Road Conservation Area, lies a unique diversity of habitat.
Limestone Escarpment
Cedar Thicket
Old Fields
Flora of South Gloucester To show how rich the flora of this area really is, Dugal did a comparison between the original 390 hectares and another floristically rich site, NCC's Stony Swamp Conservation Area. (See South Gloucester vs Stony Swamp.) In addition to species already mentioned, Dugal's list includes nodding trillium (Trillium cernuum), showy orchis (Galearis spectabilis), tall cinquefoil (Potentilla arguta), smooth yellow violet (viola eriocarpa), large-fruited snakeroot (Sanicula trifoliata), mountain mint (Pycnanthemum virginianum), white wild licorice (Gallium circaezans), and umbellate aster (Aster umbellatus). For a listing of regionally rare and sparse species in South Gloucester, please see Appendix below. Recreational ValuesIn their 1978 report, the OFNC Conservation Committee recognized the superb passive recreation potential of this site. They noted that the area was already well-used for birdwatching, nature study, hiking, skiing, and snowshoeing. Snowmobiling and dog-sled racing also occurred and were considered to be organized club affairs, restricted to well-defined trails. This being so, the Committee concluded that "they will probably not cause significant damage to vegetation." (Dugal et al, 1978). Although reduced in size, the area still offers excellent opportunities for most of the activities mentioned above. Proposed trails and picnic sites were outlined on a map prepared by the committee. A number of trails now exist, some undoubtedly new since the 1978 report. We suggest that the existing trails be marked and maintained to keep visitors from wandering off them.Land Use DesignationThe previous City of Gloucester owned 100 acres (40 hectares) of the core area under discussion, located on the west side of the Hawthorne Road extension. Ownership of the other 100 acres, known locally as Dawson's Woods, east of the Hawthorne Road extension, was held by the previous RMOC. Both sections fell under the auspices of the new city of Ottawa when the cities and the region amalgamated. There are several other smaller parcels of privately owned land adjacent to the area of concern.The RMOC had a Conservation Overlay on the site but that gave no formal protection. The Conservation Committee discussed the idea of a land trust being set up for the site, but that was not pursued. Present SituationIn 2003 the city sold 71.7 ha. of the above site to R.W. Tomlinson for future expansion of the quarry adjacent to the site. The Conservation Committee, along with others, protested the sale of this site (See OFNC letter to mayor and council).
At present the land is zoned AG-Agricultural General. In March 2004, an application was made to amend the zoning to Resource Extraction (for quarrying). The city promised that a full and proper environmental assessment would be performed before any changes were made to the area. A copy of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Level 2 mitigation plan for the site was obtained and the EIS was deemed to be inadequate, missing most of the species documented by professional botanists (see Flora of South Gloucester). We believe that a full and proper assessment needs to be done before any futher destruction of the site occurs.
References
Appendix A: Regionally Significant Native Plant Species of South GloucesterAs determined by Gillett and White 1978 (1), and Brunton 1998 (2). The Nature Conservancy rarity code (S1, S2, S3, or S4) employed by the Natural Heritage Information Centre to designate a provincially rare species, as noted in Brunton 1998, is used where applicable.
![]() |